Tuesday, October 23, 2012

60 FAMÍLIAS CAÓTICAS CAUSAM DANOS DE APRENDIZAGEM NAS CRIANÇAS


FOLHINHA STOCKWELL 60

childMr Gove said it was crucial to intervene in failing schools, particularly in poorer neighbourhoods

Related Stories

Growing up in chaotic homes is leaving some children "actively harmed" and unprepared for starting school, Education Secretary Michael Gove warns.
Mr Gove acknowledged some young children started school in nappies and unable to speak in full sentences.
He said while it was important to "exercise a degree of restraint" with state intervention, there were cases where the state must intervene.
His comments came in a speech to the Politeia think tank in London.
He was asked by Graham Allen, Labour MP for Nottingham North, about his stance on early intervention and how prior attainment affected pupils' education.
Mr Allen said: "I work with my secondary heads and they say that the raw material they are sent at age 11 is not good enough, therefore I go on to my primary heads and they say children arrive at school unable to read or recognise the difference between a letter or a number, they arrive sometimes in nappies, unable to speak in a sentence."
Evidence demonstrates that there is a need to intervene "much earlier" in life, Mr Allen said, so that the "raw material is better" to work with.
Mr Gove responded: "I think it's true.
"One of the reasons why we've shifted the focus of the academies programme to take in primary schools as well as secondary is not because we believe it's done improving secondary schools, far from it, but because there are many secondary schools doing a good job which are inherently impeded by the quality of the education offered in primary schools, and you are absolutely right, there are significant numbers of children who, because of their home environment arrive at school simply incapable of learning.
"As you can probably tell, I think it's important that we exercise a degree of restraint when we think about state intervention, but I think we both agree that there are a group of children for whom the state has to intervene because they will grow up in circumstances so chaotic that it's not just a case that they are neglected, it is the case that they are actively harmed by the failure to be in a nurturing environment where their brain can develop and where they can learn the sorts of habits which allow them to not just succeed academically at school but are effectively socialised."
Failing primaries
In his speech to Politeia, Mr Gove said it was crucial to intervene in failing schools, particularly in poorer neighbourhoods.
"We need to move even faster, extending the frontiers of opportunity, providing more excellent school places for more children than ever before.
"And I am determined that we concentrate our efforts particularly on the children in greatest need - those in the weakest schools - overwhelmingly in the most disadvantaged areas."
Mr Gove said there were hundreds of under-performing primary schools and said he would be writing to MPs asking them to support his plans to turn poor primaries into academies.
"Children in those schools are not receiving the education they deserve. And today I want to invite the MPs in those communities to work with me to open up the education system in their areas to the new providers who can raise standards."
In total, 310 poor primaries have now become, or are in the process of becoming academies, he said.
Schools are considered to be falling short if fewer than 60% of pupils reach Level 4 in their national curriculum tests, known as Sats, taken at the end of primary school.
The latest figures show that in 2011, 1,310 primary schools fell below the standard.
Shadow education secretary Stephen Twigg said: "Michael Gove's education policies are putting standards at risk - 10,000 teachers have left the profession, we've seen the biggest cuts to education budgets since the 1950s and thousands were let down by his GCSE fiasco.
"While Labour would deliver for all young people, the Tories' divisive and narrow approach is not fit for the challenges of the 21st century."

Sunday, October 21, 2012

59 COLÉGIO ANGLO-PORTUGUÊS


ANGLO-PORTUGUESE COLLEGE

Comentário sucinto da FOLHINHA STOCKWELL à notícia publicada in PALOPNEWS  online em Outubro de 2012, sobre o projeto  do centro supra alegadamente sob a égide da Coordenação do Ensino de Português na Embaixada de Portugal, do Instituto Camões e do Governo Britânico.

Sem me erguer em velho do restelo, tenho vindo a interrogar-me há muitos anos sobre um projeto desta natureza.

Tenho deparado com questões do tipo de que isto mais criaria um ghetto, o qual ainda mais atrasaria a comunidade, em termos de segregação em relação às outras comunidades incluindo as nativas, do que nos avançaria.  Seria interessante estudar por exemplo o projeto da escola primária de Wyvill (e outras), perto do Café e Patisserie Portugal  em South Lambeth road SW8, Londres, no sentido de tirar as ilações devidas. Segundo o meu conhecimento, tem-se desenvolvido nesta escola durante anos um excelente trabalho de apoio académico às crianças e pais lusófonos, com o empenho dos docentes, e não tenho notícias de que os serviços oficiais portugueses nesta capital alguma vez se tivessem envolvido. Corrijam-se se estou a errar.

Será verdadeiramente uma escola do tipo Colégio Anglo-Português que precisamos nesta altura? Não estará o governo inglês a fazer o suficiente a este nível e dirigido ao grupo etário das crianças da escola primária, secundária e universitária?

Depois de ponderação cheguei à conclusão de que não é este tipo de colégio que precisamos, sobretudo em altura de crise. Seria melhor integrarmo-nos nas escolas inglesas já existentes e incluir a nossa componente como mais valia.

Este tipo de ensino está mais do que menos coberto pelo Ministério da Educação e Qualificações Britânico, ou será que o Governo Britânico se está a demitir da sua própria responsabilidade do ensino das crianças, e vão deixar o painel administrativo do Colégio Anglo-Português com o bebé nos braços, como fizeram com o Centro Português. Cuidado, porque este governo está numa onda de privatizações e cortes orçamentais no setor público, e surgirá depois o problema do financiamento! Este college não é definitivamente a prioridade para nós.

Olhem, em Lambeth há o Lambeth College no Little Portugal, e nunca  vi lá a língua portuguesa como opção, embora lá ensinem outras línguas menos ou nada presentes aqui. É de admirar que não tenha havido um lobby oficial em defesa da língua portuguesa, e agora surjam com um  projeto para fundar um Portuguese College.

Quando fundaram o Portuguese Centre em Lambeth também fizeram um mega-projeto utópico de 1 milhão e meio de pounds e com a ideia de ir levantar fundos a Portugal! Acabaram numa casita da Câmara onde nem renda pagam. Sem comentários. Também não se vê nenhuma intervenção das autoridades mentoras e  tutelares deste centro -- Embaixada de Portugal, os  conselheiros das comunidades, e a Câmara Municipal de Lambeth no sentido de questionar todo o painel do Centro Português em kennington Road, junto à festa de Portugal em Lambeth, sobre o que estão a fazer e desatar o nó que impede o funcionamento do mesmo.  Também já é tempo deste centro marcar uma Assembleia Geral com a Comunidade e explicar os projetos que  desenvolveram e os que estão em curso.

O que faz falta aqui é por exemplo a promoção do ensino da língua  inglesa para adultos principiantes, porque muitos portugueses são recusados nas escolas inglesas porque não têm nível de acesso. As crianças têm tido o apoio linguístico necessário nas escolas inglesas via teacher assistants. (a dra. Luísa Ribeiro é certamente a pessoa indicada para informar disto). Ou será mais uma maneira de  tentar ajustar  jobs às medidas de alguns boys, como aconteceu mais ou menos com o Centro Português, o qual está a levantar muita polémica na imprensa local em português e na comunidade em geral.

Lamento ter de levantar estas preocupações, mas é necessário sermos cartesianos e  questionar,  fazer auto-crítica, ponderar,  e não inventar mais  distopias só para fazer correr tinta negativa na imprensa e nada fazer de significativo para a comunidade, assim como tem acontecido até à data presente. I rest my case.

Saturday, October 20, 2012

58 FOLHINHA: MANIFESTAÇÃO ANTI-AUSTERIDADE EM LONDRES








Anti-austerity marches take place

Demonstrators want the coalition to end public service cuts

Related Stories

Tens of thousands of people have marched in protest at the government's austerity measures.
Labour leader Ed Miliband, among dozens of speakers who addressed crowds at the biggest march in London, received a mixed reaction. Other rallies took place in Glasgow and Belfast.
The government says austerity measures are vital to cutting the deficit.
Away from the rally, the Met Police said it was responding to anti-social behaviour in the Oxford Street area.
Organiser Trades Union Congress (TUC), which said workers and campaigners from across the UK were involved with the demonstration, estimated that more than 150,000 people took part while the Met Police has not released an estimate.
Ed Miliband: "I have said whoever was in government now there would be some cuts."
That compares with the more than 250,000 people who took part in a London anti-cuts march and rally in March 2011.
Mr Miliband, speaking at a rally in Hyde Park at the end of the march, said his party was there for "all the young people in this country who want work, but can't find it in Britain today".
He was booed when he suggested there would still be spending cuts under Labour - Union leaders recently criticised Labour for supporting a public sector pay freeze.
"I have said whoever was in government now there would be some cuts, but this government has shown that cutting too far and too fast, self-defeating austerity is not the answer, it is not the answer to Britain's problems," he said.
But there were cheers when he referenced the incident in which Chancellor George Osborne had to pay for an upgrade after he sat in a first class train carriage with a standard class ticket.

At the scene

Two hours after the march began, there was still a sea of people snaking their way from the Embankment, through Whitehall, along Piccadilly and into Hyde Park for the rally.
The party atmosphere, complete with whistles, hooters and brass bands, belied the serious message from those taking part that government cuts are too harsh.
But the placards - including "no cuts" and "24 hour general strike" - said it all.
Once in Hyde Park, listening to speakers such as Ed Miliband and union leaders, the mood was more sedate.
Such were the numbers taking part in the event that the rear of the march only arrived at Hyde Park shortly before the rally ended.
He was also cheered when he spoke about Andrew Mitchell's resignation after the chief whip admitted swearing at police officers during a Downing Street confrontation, but denied calling them "plebs".
"Andrew Mitchell may have resigned, but the culture of two nations runs right across this government," Mr Miliband said.
"They cut taxes for millionaires and they raise taxes for ordinary families."
But Conservative Business Minister Michael Fallon said later that Mr Miliband's speech showed Labour could not be trusted with public finances.
Mr Fallon said: "By turning up at a rally that opposes every single spending cut that's necessary to deal with our debts, Ed Miliband has shown that he's still in favour of more spending, more borrowing and even greater debt.
"That's what got us into this mess in the first place."
The marchers - brought to London in more than 250 coaches - had assembled along Victoria Embankment on the north bank of the Thames from 1100 BST and set off at about noon.
Banners on display included those reading "Cameron has butchered Britain", "no cuts" and "plebs on parade".
In a separate development, the Met Police said it had responded to a number of incidents of anti-social behaviour in the Oxford Street shopping area and that some arrests had been made.
At the March 2011 demonstration, there were clashes between police and protesters in Trafalgar Square - hours after a peaceful march to Hyde Park. A total of 201 arrests were made that day.
Elsewhere around the UK:
  • The BBC's Laura Maxwell, at the Glasgow march, said the people there had come from all over Scotland and the north of England to add their voice to the national demonstration. Most of the criticism there was levied at the Westminster government, but the Scottish TUC says the Scottish government has to stop hiding behind Chancellor George Osborne's public sector pay cuts, our reporter added.
  • At the Belfast rally, organised by the Northern Ireland Committee of the Irish Congress of Trade Unions (Ictu), assistant general secretary Peter Bunting said Stormont must not "slavishly" cut back on the say-so of the government in London. He said workers must not allow themselves to be divided into sectarian blocs, as they had been in the past.
Earlier this month, Mr Cameron warned more "painful decisions" would be necessary to repair the UK economy, adding that he would not waver from austerity measures.
And on Saturday, around the time of the start of the London march,he posted a message on Twitter stating: "Today Ed Miliband is headlining a rally calling for an end to every single spending cut needed to clear the deficit #labourisntlearning."
Brendan Barber describes the government's austerity measures as a "negative strategy"
However, TUC general secretary Brendan Barber said: "The evidence is mounting that austerity is failing.
"More than 2.5 million people are out of work, a further three million are not working enough hours to make ends meet, and wages have been falling every month for the last three years."
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the "huge squeeze on wages and living standards" had led to a "massive hit on confidence and on demand in the economy".
"That's why some of our biggest companies that are sitting on big cash reserves aren't investing that and getting our economy moving again."
However, he said he did not think a general strike by unions was likely, adding: "Some of my colleagues may talk about that. I don't hear too many people calling for a general strike."
Taxpayers' Alliance: "Most of the public understand and accept cuts are needed."
Calls for a mass walk-out over spending cuts have grown in recent months, with the TUC Congress voting in September to look into the practicalities of organising one.
A government spokesman said: "It is disappointing that some unions insist on pushing for irresponsible and futile strike action which benefits no-one. As we have said time and again, pension talks will not be reopened and nothing further will be achieved through strike action."
Conservative Party Chairman Grant Shapps said of Ed Miliband: "You can't be serious about clearing the deficit when you attend a march that calls for an end to austerity."

FOLHINHA 57. AUTOMÓVEIS ASSASSINOS



Conduzir à maluca é a maior estupidez de todos os tempos! Nos dias de 
hoje, quem conduz com atenção e mostra respeito pela vida dos passageiros que transporta, e dos outros utentes da via mostra ser pessoa educada e amigo da comunidade. Conduzir a alta velocidade na rede viária está há muito tempo fora de moda. Só os malucos e pessoas que andam a leste ainda não sabem disso.

Já viram a infelicidade o stress e os remorsos que terão de carregar toda a vossa vida se causarem ferimentos ou matarem alguém com os vossos popós? É um peso na consciência, uma dor pesada, muito dolorosa que acorda convosco todos os dias. Esquecer ninguém consegue, nem que queira.  

Imaginem se causarem a morte da esposa, dos pais, dos filhos num acidente de viação devido a estupidez, conduzir irresponsavelmente a alta velocidade, embriagado!  Como poderão sobreviver a isso? Nem todos conseguimos...  dóidóidóidóidóidóidóidóidóidói. tobeornottobe. 

Portantos utilize o automóvel só se for realmente necessário. E quando conduzir, não faça mais nada, não se distraia com nada, nada mesmo!  Mantenha-se sempre concentrado na condução e toda a concentração é pouca!

O RISCO DE ACIDENTE DE VIAÇÃO ESTÁ SEMPRE À ESPREITA DE UM DESCUIDO DO MOTORISTA!

DEPOIS DO ACIDENTE NÃO PODERÁ DESFAZER A AÇÃO E  VOLTAR  NO TEMPO ATRÁS! NÃO HÁ MARCHA ATRÁS NISTO!

CIENTISTA INGLÊS VÍTIMA MORTAL DE ACIDENTE QUANDO UM CARRO ROUBADO EMBATE NO TÁXI EM QUE VIAJAVA NA AUSTRÁLIA. 

A FOLHINHA SENTE MUITA PENA E TRISTEZA PELA MORTE DESTE PASSAGEIRO, O QUAL  NÃO TEVE ABSOLUTAMENTE CULPA NENHUMA NO ACIDENTE. 

Family's tribute to Australia crash victim Sean Barrett
Map of Australia

Related Stories

The family of a scientist from London who was killed in a car crash soon after landing in Australia has described him as a "brilliant mind".
Sean Barrett, 36, a doctor of quantum physics at Imperial College London, had taken a taxi from Perth airport and it was hit by a stolen car, police said.
Dr Barrett, who was due to speak at a conference, and the driver of the taxi were killed in the crash on Friday.
The scientist's family said his death was a "loss to science".

Start Quote

He was a charismatic man who had the rare gift to light up any room”
Sean Barrett's family
In a statement, Dr Barrett's family said: "Sean was a brilliant mind, and a brilliant man.
"Anyone who had the pleasure to meet him in physics and beyond would tell you that.
"He was a charismatic man who had the rare gift to light up any room.
"He is a loss to science, and to life.
"Rightly, his family, friends and his colleagues whom he leaves behind are devastated."
Dr Barrett worked in London but was originally from Salford.
Earlier the local media reported both men had died at the scene while the driver of the Toyota Landcruiser, who was arrested and charged with manslaughter, was taken to hospital.
Assistant Commissioner Gary Budge said the vehicle had been reported stolen.
The driver of the stolen car "proceeded through a red light at speed".
A police helicopter had been in pursuit of the car but the chase was stood down.
The officer said there was no evidence to suggest the car was being chased at the time it crashed into the taxi.
Mr Budge said: "It is difficult to imagine the trauma the two families must be feeling today and I want to pass on our condolences to both of those families and tell them we will provide all the support that is possible."

Friday, October 19, 2012

56 SUBSÍDIO DE HABITAÇÃO PARA DEPUTADOS BRITÂNICOS





Folhinha 56

19 October 2012 Last updated at 11:23    BBC NEWS SITE
MPs expenses: Up to 27 MPs get 'dual income' from London homes

Este artigo da Folhinha destina-se sobretudo à comunidade Portuguesa e Lusófona a residir em Inglaterra.

A Folhinha converte para Português o seguinte, para aqueles que ainda não se deram ao trabalho de aprender Inglês, para tb estarem minimamente informados, sobre assuntos que lhes dizem respeito:

O Daily  Telegraph reporta que alguns Deputados Britânicos arrendam casas deles em Londres a colegas, os quais serão depois reembolsados das rendas, enquanto os Deputados senhorios arrendam para eles quartos nos hotéis para tb também serem reembolsados das despesas de alojamento. 

A astúcia reside no seguinte: a Lei sobre o Subsídio de Habitação reza que para ter direito a este subsídio, o requerente não pode ser dono de casa. Mas se eles alugarem as casas que possuem em Londres, e forem para o hotel, então assim têm direito a que lhes reembolsem as despesas de  alojamento porque você não paga renda num hotel, paga despesas de alojamento, são despesas reembolsáveis. Esta saga de esquemas parece não ter fim nos meios políticos Britânicos. 

Disto nada se sabia antes, porque a imprensa Britânica tem sido altamente reaça, contra o povo Britânico, dando-lhe só lixo a ler, e não informava sobre assuntos da classe privilegiada e poderosa. Esta imprensa parece estar a mudar desde que o novo Citizen Kane (Murdoch) foi mais ou menos abandonado pelos Tories, quando o tristemente caso célebre das escutas telefónica  começou a cheirar mal e tudo se pirou dali pra fora!

Para melhor clareza, os Deputados  têm a residência principal nas regiões que representam, fora de Londres. Mas deslocam-se frequentemente a Londres -- ou estão lá sempre, quem sabe por onde eles andam! --, para assistirem às sessões parlamentares. Encontraram hoje o próprio Ministro da Finanças a viajar numa carruagem de Primeira com bilhete de Segunda. Multa de 100 e tal quid! O que andava este tipo a fazer no comboio! 

Outro, o chefe de bancada do   Partido Tory demitiu-se hoje por ser apanhado a sair do Parlamento, de bicicleta, por um portão errado. Onde é que ele ia por ali? Chamou plebeu ao polícia que  o impediu de sair, o qual não gostou e talvez se tivesse calado se lhe tivesse chamado aristocrata, autocrata, plutocrata, ou oligarca. O plebeu plebs virou azedo na Associação da Polícia e na imprensa, e a cabeça do Tory  já só presa só por tendão, acabou por cair nas mãos do  D. Cameron. 

O governo Tory tem andado a diabolizar as classes mais vulneráveis, ameaçando-as de lhes baixar e até cortar os subsídios de subsistência.  Parece estarem a culpar  quem ganha pouco ou nada de terem desencadeado a crise económica.  Ora, é mais que sabido que quem deitou a Banca abaixo e provocou a crise da Banca  foi  a própria Banca e as classes donas da Banca.

O Governo Britânico lançou-se numa guerra contra o povo, já parece a Margareth Thatcher, a qual foi depois afastada do governo pelo próprio partido conservador de privilégios dos ricos, porque estava a dar mau nome ao partido. My dear Davide, is’s very easy to attack who’s weaker than you, Da ya know what I…?

Lembramos que a crise começou lá prás Américas,  quando a Banca Americana e outras  davam crédito a todo o miserável para comprarem casa, e depois não puderam pagar. Claro que não! Então a Banca não sabia quanto  essas pessoas ganhavam e não sabiam que os ordenados não chegavam para pagar a hipoteca? 

Até as próprias agências  de rating davam o máximo de rating aos bancos que andavam envolvidos nisto! E tb não viam os esquemas pirâmide que proliferavam na Wall Street! Talvez essas agências andassem já obcecadas  em destabilizar a Europa. Fora daqui com esses marretas! 

Só têm provocado  especulação, criaram um eldorado para os investidores do tipo tubarão, e têm deitado abaixo  os países mais vulneráveis! Segue-se o artigo em Inglês para  aficionados.


MPs expenses: Up to 27 MPs get 'dual income' from London homes

Palace of Westminster

Related Stories

As many as 27 MPs are claiming rent on taxpayer-funded second homes in London while also letting out other properties in the capital at the same time, the Daily Telegraph has claimed.
The practice is not against the rules but raises further questions about loopholes in the expenses system.

One MP said he had "no choice" but to rent out a property he owned and live elsewhere due to a change in the rules. 

This follows reports of MPs renting their subsidised home to colleagues. 

The Daily Telegraph said a number of MPs, including senior figures from all parties, have been claiming the cost of rent on subsidised second homes while also receiving rental income from other properties in London.

It said it had established 27 MPs were doing this, by cross-checking their expenses claims and entries in Parliament's register of member's interests - although the figure has not been independently verified.

Although this does not break any rules, it raises questions about the use of public money and whether MPs are finding new ways to maximise their income after a tightening of the rules on second homes following the 2009 expenses scandal. 

'No choice' The amount of rent that MPs can claim was capped as part of a far-reaching overhaul of the system in 2010, which also banned MPs from clawing back mortgage interest payments on properties they owned.

“Start Quote

Unfortunately the new system of MPs expenses means that I cannot live in my own house and I'm driven to renting a flat nearby”
Nick Harvey Lib Dem MP
 
One of the MPs named by the Telegraph, former defence minister Peter Luff, said he had bought a property in good faith under the old system but could no longer afford to meet the mortgage interest payments after the change in the rules. 

Writing on his website, Mr Luff, a Conservative MP, said he had "no choice" but to either sell it or vacate the property and rent it out.

"Having only recently purchased it, I chose to rent it out and this information has been in the public domain for two years, it having been properly declared in the Register of Members' Interests," he said.

Mr Luff said he was now living in a rented flat in preference to staying in a hotel, the other option allowed under the new rules. While IPSA's rules were "well-meaning" he said they had resulted in increased costs to the taxpayer.

Another MP named by The Telegraph, Lib Dem former defence minister Nick Harvey, told BBC News: "Unfortunately the new system of MPs expenses means that I cannot live in my own house and I'm driven to renting a flat nearby." 

The row comes a day after The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPCC), the external body in charge of expenses since 2010, decided to delay publication of information about MPs landlords. 

It had come under pressure from Commons Speaker John Bercow, who argued that MPs addresses are kept confidential by law and releasing related information under Freedom of Information laws could lead to their disclosure and jeopardise the security of MPs.
Disclosure row
 
Sir Ian Kennedy, the chair of IPSA, said it had written to all MPs claiming rent on properties in London to canvas their views about releasing the information and only a third had so far replied. 

"We are therefore delaying our response to the FOI request and will be writing to those MPs concerned to give them a further two weeks to respond," he said.

The decision to delay publication has been criticised by former Labour home secretary Jacqui Smith, one of the most high-profile casualties of the expenses scandal.

She told the Telegraph that Mr Bercow had got it "wrong" and would have to change course. 

"Any attempt to prevent this information getting into the public domain is pretty much doomed to failure. You are not going to keep these things under wraps."

“Start Quote

The prime minister is committed to transparency”
Downing Street
 
It has been reported that a handful of MPs are currently sub-letting their subsidised properties to colleagues, who are then claiming back the cost of rent on expenses. 

Such an arrangement is allowed under the system but critics say it should be disclosed in the public interest.

IPSA said there were four such cases and the information was released following an FOI request in January.

Labour MP Iain McKenzie, who rents a flat from colleague Linda Riordan, told the Daily Mail: "If I had known beforehand that the flat was owned by an MP then I probably wouldn't have taken it.

"You've got to apply the test of how it looks to the man in the street, regardless of whether it's above board or not."

Asked whether David Cameron was concerned about MPs renting out their flats, a Downing Street spokeswoman said: "Clearly the prime minister is committed to transparency, and this government has done more than any other in terms of ensuring transparency, but in this particular instance it is a matter for Ipsa.

"Ipsa has been established to deal with these sorts of issues, so it is a matter for them."

More on This Story

Related Stories


    A PROCISSÃO AINDA SÓ VAI NO ADRO.

ESTE ASSUNTO ESTÁ A AQUECER E VAMOS VER SE ALGUMAS CABEÇAS NÃO VÃO ROLAR. O QUE É ISTO SENÃO FRAUDE, EMBORA COBERTA PELA LEI.

Peter Facey, Unlock Democracy peter@unlockdemocracy.org.uk via bounce.bluestatedigital.com 
16:13 (24 minutes ago)
to me

Unlock Democracy
Dear folhinha stockwell

Click here to sign our letterThe Speaker of the House of Commons is attempting to block moves to publish the names of MPs’ landlords under a freedom of information request. He is arguing that this is on security grounds, although it would be perfectly possible to publish the names without having to publish addresses.

It seems as if we’ve been here before, with the expenses scandal in 2009. We want to avoid repeating the mistakes of the past; will you sign our letter to John Bercow demanding he agrees to publish the list?

http://action.unlockdemocracy.org.uk/bercow
The scandal in 2009 was as much about the attempted cover up as it was about the expenses abuses themselves. Far from the gaze of public scrutiny, the system had been left to fester.

There are serious questions being asked about whether MPs are continuing to milk the system by renting out one property they own (often initially purchased under the old expenses system) while getting the taxpayer to pay for rented 
accommodation elsewhere. 

It has even been alleged that it is possible for MPs to rent out properties to each other, and use the new system to make a profit. We can’t make an informed judgement on this, and how the system could be improved, unless the identities of landlords are published.

If there are any major abuses going, it would be far better for parliament to come clean about them now, rather than for them to emerge years later with the parliamentary authorities fighting publication of the list every step of the way. If we have learned nothing else from 2009’s expenses scandal, it is this.

We want to get as many people to sign our letter to John Bercow as possible by next Tuesday. We will be presenting it to him on Wednesday, so we need you to add your name now:

http://action.unlockdemocracy.org.uk/bercow
With public trust in the political system at such a low, we can’t afford parliament and Speaker Bercow open up yet another self-inflicted wound. Let’s nip it in the bud right away.
All the best,

Peter Facey