Saturday, November 2, 2013

251: Governo Direitista Cameron a criar Reino Unido das Bananas

Cartesiano a descobrir a careca ao governo ultra reaça de Cameron UK.

 Nao faltarao por ai passeios escorregadicos, narizes  e asas partidas e cursos de bananalogia em Oxford Plc. Lol. 

 O Partido Conservador Britânico transformou a House of Commons num Circo, e voce pode assistir ao espetáculo por televisão nas Quartas-Feiras na BBC ou no Canal Parlamento:

 Assistirão aos debates onde o Primeiro Ministro defende com unhas e dentes os interesses dos mais poderosos, as subidas dos preços da eletricidade pelas companhias-monopólio, da água pela companhia da água mais cara do que o petróleo, por isso os ingleses agora mudaram-se para a cerveja. 

 E isto em adição ao processo que o governo banana de  Camarão  meteu contra a Europa por estes terem imposto um plafond nos milhões dos bónus escandalosos dos banqueiros dodgy fat cats. Defendendo  os banqueiros e os bónus, eles  estão se defendendo a eles próprios. Pensamos que estes governo e constituído só por milionarios ou candiatos a isso.  Os ingleses estáo mesmo entregues à bicharada, meu!

 Vamos agora ver se também vai defender o Right Honorable Stephen Hammond, Ministro dos Transportes parados, atolado num lamaçal de off-shores (a Pearl Gas) em Gibraltar a comprar propriedades em Portugal e sabemos lá que mais. Portugal mudou a lei dos impostos e esta empresa fugiu para o Estado de Delaware nos USA.

Lamentamos algumas gralhas pelos textos fora. A nossa proofwriting jornalista está de férias na Europa, e bate o pé dizendo que férias são férias. Não a podemos criticar por isso. God bless her.

Agora querem cortar a apoio jurídico.

Todo o país digno de ser país tem de ter serviços públicos essenciais  ao cidadão, como por exemplo, de sobrevivencia, a saúde, ensino, justiça.

Mas a função deste governo é de destruir o sistema sócio-económico do país, e privatisar tudo. Eles sabem que vão perder as próximas eleições e depois estará tarde que tornem lá a meter os pés ou até nunca mais.

Eles sabem disso, e, por conseguinte, passam todos os serviços públicos para o privado onde eles depois arranjar lugares de diretores sem nunca la porem os pes, e ate  investir para sacar o dinheiro do Estado, dos impostos do cidadão. Chamem-lhes lá parvos!

O Partido Conservador Britânico é um partido extremista com gente radicalizada, o qual tem ser empurrado para as extremas onde estão os partiditos sem voz na matéria além de venderem uns jornalecos às porta do metro. Ai e o lugar do partido conservador e nao no poder.

O povo Britânico devia ter vergonha em levar ao governo, às rédeas do Estado uma vergonha de partido destes.

Os Escoceses até vão fazer um referendo para saírem da União do Reino Unido por causa disso. Já estão fartos de aturar o Partido Conservador Tory no qual eles nunca votam.

Não faz sentido estarem a ser governados por um Partido no qual não votaram. E elogiam-se a eles próprios por terem mais pandas do que deputados do Partido de Davide Camarão eleitos na Escócia!

Leia agora o artigo em Inglês sobre os cortes no apoio jurídico. Ao fazerem isto estão a acabar com a Justiça, com o Estado de Direito e não faltará po ai justiça feita por mão própria.

Qurem transformar o Reino Unido no Reino  das bananas!
2 November 2013 Last updated at 10:57

Legal aid cuts criticised by Treasury Counsel and Bar Council



Protesters against legal aid cuts outside Westminster
The planned cuts have attracted a series of protests

Related Stories

Government plans to cut legal aid in criminal cases have been criticised by an elite group of barristers used by it to prosecute the most serious crimes.
Treasury Counsel, appointed by the attorney general, said the cuts - £220m from a yearly budget of £1bn for criminal cases - were unsustainable.
The Bar Council and the Law Society also criticised the plans.
But the Ministry of Justice said savings were needed to ensure the system could help those most in need.
A final consultation on proposed cuts to legal aid in criminal work in England and Wales closed on Saturday.
Legal aid costs taxpayers about £2bn every year - half goes on criminal defence and the rest on civil cases including mental health, asylum and family law involving domestic violence, forced marriage or child abduction.
'Cuts before justice'
Government proposals include cutting fees in complex, high cost cases by 30%, and in other crown court work by up to 18%.
Treasury Counsel said the "entirely obvious and predictable outcomes will be lost quality and reduced supply of criminal advocates".
Meanwhile, the Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, accused the government of putting "cuts before justice".
Maura McGowan QC, chairwoman of the Bar, told BBC Radio 5 live there was clear evidence that standards were at risk.
"The fees that are paid to people who do these cases have been reduced by almost as much as 40% already, before the planned reductions," she said.
"It will drive people of quality out of the system and will mean those who depend on publicly funded representation run the risk of getting a lower standard.
"So to say that they're making these cuts because they want to protect those who most need help, cannot be right."
'Maintain quality'
The Law Society, which represents some 130,000 solicitors in England and Wales, said it had some concerns about proposals for flat fees in magistrates' courts and the crown court and a single national fixed fee for police station work.
Law Society President Nicholas Fluck said: "To maintain quality, it is vital that we have the most diverse range of solicitors possible in the system within the boundaries of long-term financial viability.
"The current proposals for a single national fixed fee for police station work will have a disproportionate effect on firms in high-cost areas where the cost of doing business is greater.
"It is unwise to risk tarnishing the respect in which our justice system both domestically and internationally is held by an apparent incentive to plead guilty, which could jeopardise the relationship of trust between clients and solicitors."
The MoJ said the cut in high cost cases was to ensure it would impact high earners and not junior barristers, and denied other cuts were unjust.
'Generous' system
An MoJ spokeswoman said: "We have tried to ensure our proposals have more impact on high earners - 70% of criminal barristers contracted to Very High Cost Cases receive fee incomes of over £100,000, which is why we targeted the largest fee reductions at this type of work.
"Nor do we accept our proposed rates for more routine work are unjust. The minimum a QC would be paid for such a case is £306 each day.
"At around £2 billion a year we have one of the most expensive legal aid systems in the world and even after our changes would still have one of the most generous.
"We agree legal aid is a vital part of our justice system and that's why we have to find efficiencies to ensure it remains sustainable and available to those most in need of a lawyer.
"We have engaged constructively and consistently with lawyers - including revising our proposals in response to their comments - and to allege we have not is re-writing history."
Your comments (102)

More on This Story

Related Stories

From other news sites

Comments

Jump to comments pagination
  •  
    +9

    Comment number42.

     
    I think people are confusing commercial fees with publicly funded criminal fees. Many criminal barristers I know work for £50 per day, don't get travel expenses, don't have a pension, don't get sick pay, don't receive maternity/paternity pay.......etc.
    Please stop spouting what the Government want you to believe. It's embarrassing.
  •  
    +2

    Comment number29.

     
    Solicitors and Barristers should have to do a fixed proportion of legal aid work for free as a precondition of being allowed to practice privately. Reports on the quality of their legal aid work could be made available to potential private clients to make sure they are motivated to do their best work on legal aid cases.
  •  
    +9

    Comment number21.

     
    You get the justice you can afford in Britain and how many can afford it?. At £500/hour for a QC and £250/hour for a solicitor it ain't cheap. At these ridiculous prices it does make you wonder who should be in the dock in court.The accused or their advocates?

More UK stories

RSS

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)